What they published: An automated page labelling us "Controversial", "High-Risk" and "Unsafe", alleging "high-risk activity related to phishing, spamming" and malware, and a score of 15.5/100.
What the independent, recognised authorities actually say:
- Google Safe Browsing — Google's official system that powers the unsafe-site warnings shown in Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Google Search — returns "No unsafe content found" for aiwebpageseo.com. This is the definitive authority on whether a site is dangerous, and it confirms we are not.
- IPQualityScore (IPQS), a fraud-prevention provider used across the security industry, rates aiwebpageseo.com LOW RISK, with Phishing & Malware Detection: CLEAN, a Low Risk threat score, valid SPF & DMARC mail security, and confirms the domain is "primarily used for legitimate purposes."
- Google and Bing both crawl and index aiwebpageseo.com normally and regularly. Search engines actively de-rank and warn against genuine phishing and malware sites — they do not index them as normal. This is a far more authoritative signal than any "trust score" algorithm.
- The site uses a valid HTTPS certificate (Let's Encrypt) — a fact their own report confirms.
- VirusTotal aggregates more than 90 independent security vendors. Not one flagged aiwebpageseo.com as malicious — the overwhelming majority (including Google Safebrowsing, Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Sophos, Phishtank and OpenPhish) return a verdict of Clean. There are no phishing or malware detections whatsoever.
- Spamhaus — one of the most respected threat-intelligence and blocklist authorities in the industry — shows no malicious detections for our server IP (87.106.96.71). This directly contradicts Scam-Detector's unevidenced claim that we were "detected on blacklist engines."
- Sucuri SiteCheck — No malware found, no injected spam, no defacements, and not blacklisted (confirmed clean by Google Safe Browsing, McAfee, Sucuri Labs, ESET, PhishTank, Yandex and Opera).
- URLVoid — 0 / 35 detections across its blocklist engines.
- Norton Safe Web — rates aiwebpageseo.com Safe.
- Cisco Talos — Web Reputation Neutral, and not on the Talos Security Intelligence block list.
- MxToolbox blacklist check — clean on 68 of 70 blacklists, including every major one (Spamhaus ZEN, Spamhaus DBL, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS). The only two listings are UCEPROTECT Levels 2 and 3 — which do not list our site at all, but blanket-list entire hosting-provider IP ranges; our own IP is clean on UCEPROTECT Level 1.
- We serve identical content to visitors and to search engines (no cloaking), run no malicious code, and never ask visitors for sensitive data. You can verify this yourself using the "Verify us" checks inside our audit tools.
Why their rating is, in our view, meaningless: Their own report admits — in writing — that their "investigation continues working to pinpoint the specific category." In other words, they branded us a phishing/malware/spam risk while simultaneously admitting they had identified no such activity. Their score is driven chiefly by one automated factor: our domain being newly registered (February 2026). A new domain is not evidence of wrongdoing — every legitimate business starts with one.
We are not alone, and this appears to be a pattern. Their own public Trustpilot reviews are filled with legitimate businesses reporting identical treatment — false "scam" labels, no supporting evidence, and the same "newly registered domain" excuse. It is our view that an automated site which publishes unsubstantiated "scam" and "high-risk" labels about real businesses — while earning money from affiliate links to security products, VPNs and data-removal services placed throughout those same warning pages — has a clear commercial incentive to alarm visitors, and is not a credible or authoritative source.
Don't take our word for it — read what other businesses say about them. You can see the pattern for yourself in their own independent reviews: Scam-Detector.com reviews on Trustpilot. There you will find numerous business owners describing the same experience — being falsely labelled, given no evidence, and in many cases reporting that the only way to improve the score is to engage with the site. We suggest you judge their credibility by what those affected by them have to say.
Our position: We have formally written to Scam-Detector.com requiring them to either produce specific evidence for every allegation — the phishing URL, the malware sample, the named blacklist — or withdraw the claims entirely. The burden of proof is theirs. We are confident in our business, our tools, and the independent data above, and we will continue to challenge false statements about us wherever they are published.
