/ โ† Readability Fixes / Low Flesch Score
In this guide
  1. What the score is made of
  2. Why pages end up with low scores
  3. Diagnosing a low score
  4. The fix, step by step
  5. Before and after: where the points come from
  6. Where the score comes from on common platforms
  7. Edge cases and when to leave a low score alone
  8. Keeping scores from sliding back
  9. Questions and answers

What the score is made of

Rudolf Flesch published the Reading Ease formula in 1948 for printed English. It has only two moving parts, and knowing how much each one weighs is the key to fixing a low score efficiently.

Reading Ease = 206.835 โˆ’ (1.015 ร— words per sentence) โˆ’ (84.6 ร— syllables per word)

The first input is average sentence length. Each extra word in the average sentence costs about one point. The second input is average word length measured in syllables. Its multiplier is far larger, so small changes in word choice move the score a lot: raising the average from 1.4 to 1.5 syllables per word costs about 8.5 points, roughly the same as adding eight words to every sentence.

Two worked examples

TextWords per sentenceSyllables per wordReading Ease
A typical corporate services page201.5206.835 โˆ’ 20.3 โˆ’ 126.9 = about 60
The same page after rewriting141.4206.835 โˆ’ 14.2 โˆ’ 118.4 = about 74

The rewrite gained about 14 points. Roughly six came from shorter sentences and eight from plainer words. That split is common, and it is why cutting sentences alone often disappoints: people chop a paragraph into fragments, see the score rise by three or four points and give up.

The bands Flesch described

ScoreFlesch's description
90 to 100Very easy
80 to 89Easy
70 to 79Fairly easy
60 to 69Standard
50 to 59Fairly difficult
30 to 49Difficult
0 to 29Very difficult

Scores can fall below zero for extremely dense text and rise above 100 for very simple text. Neither is an error; the formula has no hard limits.

Why pages end up with low scores

A low score almost always has one of a handful of causes. Spotting which applies to your page saves a lot of rewriting in the wrong place.

The last cause is the one to leave alone. The aim is to remove difficulty that the subject does not require, not to pretend the subject is simpler than it is.

Diagnosing a low score

Run the page through the Readability Checker. It reports Flesch Reading Ease alongside Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog and average sentence length, and it flags individual sentences that need attention. Those extra numbers tell you where to look.

Reading the numbers together

What you seeLikely causeWhere to start
Low Reading Ease, average sentence length under about 18 wordsLong wordsWord choice and nominalisations
Low Reading Ease, average sentence length well over 20 wordsLong sentencesThe flagged sentences, longest first
Gunning Fog much higher than the Flesch-Kincaid gradeMany words of three or more syllablesWord choice
Score changes a lot when you remove a table or listNon-prose text skewing the countScore the prose on its own
Score is fine but readers still struggleStructure, order or missing contextHeadings, opening paragraph, examples

Estimating syllables per word yourself

If your tool does not show syllables per word, you can work it out backwards. Rearranging the formula: syllables per word = (206.835 โˆ’ 1.015 ร— words per sentence โˆ’ Reading Ease) รท 84.6. A page with a score of 45 and an average of 16 words per sentence comes out at about 2.05 syllables per word. Everyday English prose usually sits well below that, so this page has a vocabulary problem, not a sentence problem.

๐Ÿ’ก Paste one paragraph at a time into the checker to find the worst sections. Pages are rarely uniformly hard; the introduction and the "about our approach" section often score far lower than the rest.

The fix, step by step

Step 1

Score only the body text

Copy the main content of the page into the Readability Checker without the navigation, footer, cookie banner, product codes, prices or specification tables. Keep headings out too, because many tools count a heading with no full stop as part of the next sentence. Note the Reading Ease score, the average sentence length and the other measures in a spreadsheet so you have a clean baseline that reflects only the prose your visitors actually read.

Step 2

Work out which input is the problem

Look at the average sentence length first. If it is above about 20 words, sentence length is costing you points. If it is below about 18 words and the score is still low, the vocabulary is the problem. You can confirm by estimating syllables per word from the formula. Knowing which lever to pull stops you spending an hour chopping sentences when the real drag comes from long, abstract words.

Step 3

Rewrite the costliest passages first

Paste each section or paragraph into the checker separately and rank them by score. Rewrite the lowest-scoring passages first, because a few dense paragraphs usually account for most of the damage. Within each one, start with the sentences the checker flags. Split any sentence that carries more than one idea, lead with the subject and verb, and cut padding such as in order to or at this point in time.

Step 4

Swap long words that have plain equivalents

Search the text for words ending in -tion, -ment, -ality and -isation, and for stock business words such as utilise, facilitate and commence. Replace each with a shorter word only where the meaning survives: use, help, start. Turn nouns back into verbs, so "make a decision" becomes "decide". Keep the specialist terms your readers use and search for themselves, and define any that newcomers might not know.

Step 5

Set a target for your audience

Decide what score is realistic for the people reading this page rather than copying a figure from a plugin. A page for the general public can usually reach the 60s or higher. A page for accountants, engineers or clinicians may sit lower and still be clear to them. Compare against your own best-performing pages on similar topics, and write the target into your style guide so every author aims for the same range.

Step 6

Re-score, read aloud and record the result

Run the rewritten body text through the checker again and record the new score beside the baseline. Then read the page aloud from start to finish. Stop wherever you stumble, lose the thread or sound robotic, because a higher score achieved with choppy fragments or vague words is not an improvement. Publish, then check the page again after later edits so the score does not drift back down.

Before and after: where the points come from

The two rewrites below target different inputs. Seeing them side by side shows why you should diagnose before you edit.

A vocabulary problem

Before: "Our organisation facilitates the implementation of comprehensive maintenance solutions. Utilisation of our services ensures operational continuity."

Only two sentences, of nine and seven words, yet the score is extremely low, probably below zero, because nearly every word has four or more syllables.

After: "We service and repair your equipment so it keeps running. Book us once and we handle the rest."

The sentences got slightly longer, and the score rose sharply, because the syllable count per word fell by about half.

A sentence problem

Before: "If you would like to change your delivery date you can do this through your account up until 48 hours before the scheduled delivery, after which point you will need to contact our customer service team by phone, as changes cannot be made online once the order has been passed to the courier."

Fifty-three words in one sentence. The words themselves are mostly short.

After: "You can change your delivery date in your account up to 48 hours before delivery. After that, please phone us. We cannot change it online once the courier has your order."

Three sentences, 31 words. The meaning is intact and the reader gets the deadline first.

โš ๏ธ Both "after" versions are better because a person reads them faster, not because the number went up. If a rewrite raises the score but loses a condition, a deadline or a legal requirement, put the detail back.

Where the score comes from on common platforms

Different tools apply the same formula but count differently, so expect small disagreements.

๐Ÿ’ก Pick one tool for tracking and stick with it. A change from 52 to 61 in the same tool is meaningful; a difference of five points between two different tools usually is not.

Edge cases and when to leave a low score alone

Non-English pages

The 1948 formula and its constants were built for English. Scoring a French, German or Welsh page with it gives numbers that do not mean what the bands say. Adapted versions exist for some languages, and some tools switch formula automatically. If yours does not, judge non-English pages by sentence length and a native reader's opinion rather than by the English score.

Very short pages

On a page with 80 words, one long product name or one unusual sentence can move the score by ten points. Scores on short text are unstable. Look at the individual sentences instead.

Regulated wording

Financial promotions, medical information and terms and conditions sometimes contain wording you cannot change. Score the parts you control, and consider adding a plain summary above fixed wording rather than rewriting it. This is not legal advice; check any change to regulated text with whoever signs it off.

Expert audiences

A page written for specialists can score in the 30s or 40s and still be the right page for its readers. Check that the difficulty comes from necessary terms and not from padding. If an expert would also find it slow, rewrite it.

The score and search

Google has not said it uses Flesch Reading Ease or any readability formula in ranking. Raising the score is worth doing because readers find the page easier, not because a number is being measured by a search engine.

Keeping scores from sliding back

For related fixes, see fixing sentences over 20 words and fixing a high reading grade level, which works on the same inputs from the grade-level side.

Questions and answers

1. What is a good Flesch Reading Ease score?

There is no single correct figure. Flesch described 60 to 69 as standard and 70 to 79 as fairly easy, and many writers aim for the 60s or above for pages meant for the general public. Pages for professionals can sit lower and still work well for their readers. The better question is whether the people you write for can read the page quickly. Use your own best pages on similar topics as the benchmark, and set a range rather than one exact number.

2. Why is my Flesch score low when my sentences are short?

Because the formula weighs word length heavily. Each 0.1 increase in average syllables per word costs about eight and a half points, which is roughly the effect of adding eight words to every sentence. A page full of words such as implementation, functionality or organisational can therefore score low even with short sentences. Look for long abstract words and nouns made from verbs, and replace them with shorter everyday words where the meaning stays the same.

3. Why do different tools give me different Flesch scores?

All of them use the same formula, but they count the inputs differently. Syllables are counted by rules rather than a dictionary, so tools disagree on words such as area or business. They also disagree on where a sentence ends when they meet headings, bullet points, abbreviations and decimal points, and some include navigation and footer text. A gap of a few points between tools is normal. Track progress in one tool rather than comparing numbers across several.

4. Will improving my Flesch score help my Google rankings?

Not directly as far as anyone can show. Google has not said it uses a readability formula, and there is no public evidence that Flesch Reading Ease is part of ranking. What Google does say is that it aims to reward helpful content written for people. A page that is easier to read is more likely to satisfy visitors and to be quoted accurately by search features and AI assistants. Improve the score for readers, and treat any search benefit as a side effect.

5. Can I get a high score by just using very short sentences?

You can raise the number that way, but you will often make the page worse. Chopping every sentence into fragments of five or six words makes text feel jerky and can break the links between ideas. It also only works on one of the two inputs, so a page full of long words will still score poorly. Aim for a mix of short and medium sentences, one idea per sentence, and plainer vocabulary where it fits.

6. Should technical or legal pages have a high Flesch score?

They should be as easy to read as the subject allows, which may still be a lower score than a consumer page. Keep the terms your readers need and search for, and define them on first use if some readers may not know them. Remove the difficulty that the subject does not require, such as padding, stacked clauses and nouns made from verbs. For regulated wording you cannot change, a plain summary above it helps readers without altering the approved text.

7. Does the Flesch formula work for languages other than English?

The original formula was built for English, and its constants reflect English word and sentence patterns. Applying it unchanged to other languages gives scores that do not match the descriptive bands. Some languages have adapted versions, and some tools switch formula automatically depending on the page language. If your tool does not, use sentence length and feedback from a native speaker who matches your audience as your guide for non-English pages.

Find the passages dragging your score down

The Readability Checker calculates Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Gunning Fog, average sentence length, passive voice share, paragraph length and jargon density, and flags the sentences that need attention.

Open Readability Fixes โ†’
๐Ÿ’ฌ Got a problem?
Related Guides: All Readability Fixes  ·  Readability Guide  ·  Fixing Sentences Over 20 Words  ·  Fixing a High Reading Grade Level  ·  Learning Hub

About aiwebpageseo

aiwebpageseo.com is a data-driven SEO and AEO (Answer Engine Optimisation) platform providing a free suite of technical SEO tools. Rather than relying on AI-theorised assumptions, the platform analyses live URL performance, delivering objective diagnostics, page speed metrics, CLS debugging, and site crawl data alongside actionable technical tutorials.